tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post113595903378576097..comments2024-01-24T04:59:45.518-05:00Comments on Jewish Atheist: Over Three Hundred Proofs of God's ExistenceJewish Atheisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04616617537150446818noreply@blogger.comBlogger27125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-49770495420832747212007-10-02T14:48:00.000-04:002007-10-02T14:48:00.000-04:00just have to say i loved this! this is the definit...just have to say i loved this! this is the definition of wit and good humour. very cleverAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136262071109460472006-01-02T23:21:00.000-05:002006-01-02T23:21:00.000-05:00Very entertaining. Thanks :)Very entertaining. Thanks :)elfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16271905313295544312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136213491294061712006-01-02T09:51:00.000-05:002006-01-02T09:51:00.000-05:00Brian: "You are all individuals"Crowd: "We are all...Brian: "You are all individuals"<BR/>Crowd: "We are all individuals"<BR/>Brian: "You are all different"<BR/>Crowd: "We are all different"<BR/>Random Man: "Not me"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136187189749930062006-01-02T02:33:00.000-05:002006-01-02T02:33:00.000-05:00I love Monty Python!! It is ironic that you posted...I love Monty Python!! <BR/>It is ironic that you posted this, a few nights ago I watched “The Life of Brian” it was pretty funny. One of my favorite scenes was in the beginning when they are going to stone the blasphemer for speaking Jehova’s name aloud, hilarious!JDHURFhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02133971619468463558noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136177284486479372006-01-01T23:48:00.000-05:002006-01-01T23:48:00.000-05:00And while we're at bad logical arguments, I just h...And while we're at bad logical arguments, I just had to give you all the best one ever:<BR/>---<BR/> BEDEVERE: Quiet, quiet. Quiet! There are ways of telling whether<BR/>she is a witch. Tell me, what do you do with witches?<BR/>VILLAGER #2: Burn!<BR/>BEDEVERE: And what do you burn apart from witches?<BR/>VILLAGER #2: Wood!<BR/>BEDEVERE: So, why do witches burn?<BR/>[pause]<BR/>VILLAGER #3: B--... 'cause they're made of wood...?<BR/>BEDEVERE: Good! So, how do we tell whether she is made of wood?<BR/>VILLAGER #1: Build a bridge out of her.<BR/>BEDEVERE: Aah, but can you not also build bridges out of stone?<BR/>VILLAGER #2: Oh, yeah.<BR/>BEDEVERE: Does wood sink in water?<BR/>VILLAGER #1: No, no.<BR/>VILLAGER #2: It floats! It floats!<BR/>BEDEVERE: What also floats in water?<BR/>VILLAGER #1: Bread!<BR/>VILLAGER #2: Apples!<BR/>VILLAGER #3: Very small rocks!<BR/>VILLAGER #1: Cider!<BR/>VILLAGER #2: Great gravy!<BR/>VILLAGER #1: Cherries!<BR/>VILLAGER #2: Mud!<BR/>VILLAGER #3: Churches -- churches!<BR/>VILLAGER #2: Lead -- lead!<BR/>ARTHUR: A duck.<BR/>BEDEVERE: Exactly! So, logically...,<BR/>VILLAGER #1: If... she.. weighs the same as a duck, she's made of<BR/>wood.<BR/>BEDEVERE: And therefore--?<BR/>VILLAGER #1: A witch!<BR/>---<BR/>and if you didn't recognize the quote, then you must rent Monty Python and the Holy Grail now...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136136501540133242006-01-01T12:28:00.000-05:002006-01-01T12:28:00.000-05:00Sadie Lou said: Why?I presume you mean why I think...Sadie Lou said: Why?<BR/><BR/>I presume you mean why I think he doesn't know much about evolution?<BR/><BR/>For starters it seems that he is assuming that humans are to top of the evolutionary 'chain' and that all other creatures are on their way to being us. Not true.<BR/><BR/>Evolution doesn't 'aim' at anything. It's just hubris to think that we are the final evolutionary step. Evolution is still happening and will continue to happen LONG after we're extinct.<BR/><BR/>Evolution is all about adaptation to the environment. Ants, for example, have been around basically in the same form for hundreds of times the length we've been here. They are superbly adapted to their environment. It's just silly to think that ants - or anything else for that matter - are on their way to evolving towards us...CyberKittenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06394155516712665665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136131723617037772006-01-01T11:08:00.000-05:002006-01-01T11:08:00.000-05:00cyberkitten--Why?cyberkitten--<BR/>Why?Sadie Louhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07362158642491145353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136120108145725512006-01-01T07:55:00.000-05:002006-01-01T07:55:00.000-05:00Thanks, JA, Funny post, I needed a smile to start ...Thanks, JA, Funny post, I needed a smile to start of the day !Ben Avuyahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08814145983874592449noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136077933596013062005-12-31T20:12:00.000-05:002005-12-31T20:12:00.000-05:00There you go, aj. You're getting the hang of it. ...There you go, aj. You're getting the hang of it. :)Jewish Atheisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04616617537150446818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136077304246034002005-12-31T20:01:00.000-05:002005-12-31T20:01:00.000-05:00(1) Many people who are religious think they have ...(1) Many people who are religious think they have logical proofs for God<BR/>(2) The ones I have been told are false<BR/>(2a) I have never heard a true proof for God<BR/>(3) Therefore, God doesn't existAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136076972944052932005-12-31T19:56:00.000-05:002005-12-31T19:56:00.000-05:00(1) Killing people is bad(2) People who believe in...(1) Killing people is bad<BR/>(2) People who believe in God have killed others over the years<BR/>(3) Therefore God doesn't exist<BR/><BR/>-------<BR/><BR/>I've heard this logic before numerous times (or something close to it). Everyone uses false logic when it supports them...not only pro-Religious folkAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136076364192840582005-12-31T19:46:00.000-05:002005-12-31T19:46:00.000-05:00Sadie Lou quoted: If the law was of a constant an...Sadie Lou quoted: If the law was of a constant and permanent nature, ever working itself out, how was it that for thousands of years past, no lower creature had evolved into a human being."<BR/><BR/>This guy is not a Christian by the way. <BR/><BR/>Maybe he isn't... But he SURE doesn't understand evolution....CyberKittenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06394155516712665665noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136068430844209022005-12-31T17:33:00.000-05:002005-12-31T17:33:00.000-05:00I found this quote on a really informational websi...I found this quote on a really informational website called "debunking evolution"<BR/><BR/><I>"Misguided religion has led to fanaticism and superstition. Predetermination takes the place of honest inquiry and truth is suppressed. All the fallacies of human reason must be exhausted or rejected, before the light of higher truth could meet with ready response."</I><BR/><BR/>I would adopt that mantra as my own, as it clearly states my own feelings about fanatical Christians.<BR/><BR/>He also says:<BR/>"If man had really evolved from a lower creature, then it was, as it were, a fact - a law which according to evolutionists, was unceasing in its operations under any conditions whatsoever. If the law was of a constant and permanent nature, ever working itself out, how was it that for thousands of years past, no lower creature had evolved into a human being."<BR/><BR/>I had to read and re-read this statement a few times before a light bulb went on and I thought, YES!<BR/><BR/>This guy is not a Christian by the way.Sadie Louhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07362158642491145353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136066442069135992005-12-31T17:00:00.000-05:002005-12-31T17:00:00.000-05:00Please, Oracle. Enlighten us with a "true" apolog...Please, Oracle. Enlighten us with a "true" apologetic argument.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136066397932778142005-12-31T16:59:00.000-05:002005-12-31T16:59:00.000-05:00Yeah, let's try to keep it civil, guys. I admit m...Yeah, let's try to keep it civil, guys. I admit my post was a little dismissive of theism, but I really don't think it's that far off. What is the cosmological argument if not the one presented? Leaving out the insulting part, isn't the "argument from creation" a fair representation of the anti-evolutionist crowd? Isn't the Ontological argument fairly representative?Jewish Atheisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04616617537150446818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136063530360342172005-12-31T16:12:00.000-05:002005-12-31T16:12:00.000-05:00We can disagree and still be kind to one another. ...We can disagree and still be kind to one another. I believe Inteligent Design is evangelistic Christianity disguised. I believe creationism is wrongheaded and foolish. I believe Judge Jones is the sexiest man alive. I believe anyone can believe differently. Oracle comes here to post, and should be ready to be disagreed with, but the quality of his/her expression doesn't need to be rated. Agree or disagree, don't grade the guy.Foilwomanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01439472253349139358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136056103435623082005-12-31T14:08:00.000-05:002005-12-31T14:08:00.000-05:00Although I don't think Oracle represents himself v...Although I don't think Oracle represents himself very well, it's never very respectable to make fun of other people. I feel sorry for Oracle--he gets ganged up on quite a bit. There are other ways of addressing his faults without "slapping him around".<BR/>It's actually very representitive of this whole post: Let's poke fun of people who are different than us and who clearly believe differently than us.<BR/>Find me some Christians making fun of atheists this way and I'll show you hypocracy; show me an atheist making fun of Christians and it's "common sense" or "they deserve it because they're so stupid"<BR/>Whatever.Sadie Louhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07362158642491145353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136041267392299552005-12-31T10:01:00.000-05:002005-12-31T10:01:00.000-05:00Oracle, do you realize how stupid you look to inte...Oracle, do you realize how stupid you look to intelligent human beings?Baconeaterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11134934827966299989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136040751357062602005-12-31T09:52:00.000-05:002005-12-31T09:52:00.000-05:00Jdurf beat me to it, but I'll say it anyway becaus...Jdurf beat me to it, but I'll say it anyway because it's just so F'n absurd! Evolution is the archaic theory? Do you own a dictionary Oracle? If you put creationism (as it's understood in the U.S. as the Abrahamic mythology) next to evolutionary theory - which one is archaic? Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black?Laurahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17129109937230440481noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1136015924826663082005-12-31T02:58:00.000-05:002005-12-31T02:58:00.000-05:00“Agreed, I always just remember that atheist's bel...“Agreed, I always just remember that atheist's beliefs are falling apart, so they just attack those who are delivering the evidence.”<BR/><BR/>“The interesting thing is about the amount of thought that goes into evolutionist arguments. Not surprising since this is the best an evolutionist can come up with to support his archaic theory!” – Oracle25<BR/><BR/>What exactly are you talking about? This post was not about evolution. Though if you would like to make it about evolution, I suppose you are more than welcome to do so. Tell me, in what way is atheism falling apart? Atheistic beliefs have been around since the written word, it has been immensely furthered and in no way is it “falling apart”. What I find sadistically ironic is that it is actually the fundamental theists that are doing the “evidence attacking,” they constantly search for the “holes,” “gaps,” and “inaccuracies” of evolution it is they (and you) that are doing the attacking my friend, not the other way around. Maybe this is a case of a behavior similar to psychological displacement, you feel an anxious neurosis that your beliefs are being called out as fraudulent so in reaction you go on the offensive claiming that others beliefs are fraudulent as the result of an unconscious ego defense mechanism.<BR/>Sure there is a large amount of thought that goes into evolutionist arguments, but this does not prove anything one way or the other. For I may expend large amounts of energy and thought attempting to learn how to fly but this does not mean that natural human flight is possible or realistic. <BR/>Also evolution is not an archaic theory, especially compared to the theory of creationism that was created over 2000 years ago! Evolution is a newborn as compared to the religious “alternative”. Again this seems to be a perverse form of displacement, evolution is not archaic creationism and ID is!!JDHURFhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02133971619468463558noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1135981627526620412005-12-30T17:27:00.000-05:002005-12-30T17:27:00.000-05:00Send them the site I linked to, Robert. I didn't ...Send them the site I linked to, Robert. I didn't write it.<BR/><BR/>Not that it'll do any good. :)Jewish Atheisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04616617537150446818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1135981291806315052005-12-30T17:21:00.000-05:002005-12-30T17:21:00.000-05:00JAThis post is um, Devine Perfection.May I have pe...JA<BR/>This post is um, Devine Perfection.<BR/>May I have permission to send it to<BR/>the Discover Institute,Michael Behe,and assorted fundamentalists<BR/>in the Dover,PA.area?<BR/><BR/>RWAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1135980201062191652005-12-30T17:03:00.000-05:002005-12-30T17:03:00.000-05:00Personally, I liked numbers 345 and 352. But yes,...Personally, I liked numbers 345 and 352. But yes, that page is great fun. And actually, I wouldn't really diss that listing too much; the only things that separate many of those arguments from full-blown apologetic arguments are sheer word count and use of a thesaurus.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1135966557920437952005-12-30T13:15:00.000-05:002005-12-30T13:15:00.000-05:00Somehow I doubt that the person who believes these...<I>Somehow I doubt that the person who believes these passed Geometry class in high school... </I><BR/><BR/>exactly.<BR/>I could read these "arguments" and be offended but they are so lacking in any kind of fact; they ARE laughable.Sadie Louhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07362158642491145353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13054771.post-1135962159566479612005-12-30T12:02:00.000-05:002005-12-30T12:02:00.000-05:00Excellent post! I needed a good laugh!Excellent post! I needed a good laugh!Wandering Coyotehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01478039463695542535noreply@blogger.com